back to new archives for 15-17 June 2000
Friday, June 16, 2000
By Patrick Craddock

Week five begins. The media death skull face of terrorist George Speight
struts and talks on the media as he plays his game of Winner-take-all.

First, comes the destruction of the centre of Suva at a cost of twenty
million dollars, then the resigning of the President, followed by the abrupt
dismissal the 1997 Constitution as the army placed armed soldiers at
checkpoints around Suva and other parts of the country. Whither the good
name of Fiji?

Last night army spokesman (TV 15 June) says George and his supporters have
already cost the country nearly two hundred million dollars. But, George is
a bad businessman.

Sitting through nightly curfews with changing moods of anger, boredom, fear,
and futurising about Fiji after Speight, it has been difficult to decide who
is cheering for whom in this dark game of Democratic Death. For some time it
has been clear that standing in the front of the audience looking at
Speight's moves is a shifting sound of chiefs. As they talk, the word
"indigenous" rises above the Kava bowl; there is doubt about what is means,
as the word is steadily being blown away by the approaching hurricane of job
losses and poverty for all the poor "Fiji islanders."

There is a huge audience watching this slow game of Democratic Death. It is
becoming easier to recognize the names and faces of people and to decide
which side they are supporting. The law fraternity is already fracturing.

The Chief Justice Sir Timoci Tuivaga (The Fiji Daily Post 15 June and TV) is
replying to criticism leveled at him by legal colleagues of The Council of
the Fiji Law Society.

Timoci, they are asking, just what are doing by helping the military draft
their decrees? You promised in your oath to support to uphold the 1997
Constitution. But, said Sir TimociÉ. the situation has changed. The Chief
Justice hinted that he might consider resigning over the matter.

The Fiji Women's Rights Movement (FWRM) in their strongest statement yet,
are asking New Zealand to put a boycott on all sports involving Fiji teams.
They want the removal of the Fiji peacekeepers from the United Nations; an
embargo on arms to Fiji and sanctions on international travel for all those
responsible for the coup, including their families. They think family
members visiting or studying in New Zealand should be sent home.

But there also are the Fiji fence sitters quietly watching the Death of
Democracy game as if it has nothing to do with them.

The University of the South Pacific in Suva renounced the traditional
belief that a university should be being a bastion of free speech, by
closing down their Journalism website.

Bob Challenor, The Chief Executive of the Fiji Rugby Football Union (FRFU)
said on the TV news ( 15 June ) that he sees no connection between the
Speight insurrection and the New Zealand cancellation of visas.

Wow. But when the FRFU wants money there is plenty of happy hour talk about
rugby players being ambassadors for their country. I recall the world
achievements of the Fiji Sevens as a victory for all "Fiji islanders."

The most telling story of the last week on the question of "which side are
you on", comes from the second page of The Fiji Sun. On Monday of this week
a Chief, the Tui Labasa Ratu Joe Qomate said that the Army commander, Frank
Bainimarama had been " É approached traditionally to carry out the coup. His
reaction to these approaches is sorry to say, one of shame," says Ratu

I guess an interpretation all depends on how you view democracy, loyalty to
your leader and country and treachery. I must remember to read
Shakespeare's "Macbeth" again.



This site is best viewed using Netscape 4.0 or higher.
Any problems or kind suggestions, please email:

last revision June 15, 2000